Using data compiled in December, Standard & Poors released its Case-Shiller Index Tuesday. The report shows home prices down just 2.5% on an annual basis, a figure much lower than the 8.7% annual drop reported after Q3.
According to Case-Shiller representatives, the housing market is “in better shape than it was this time last year”, but some of the summer’s momentum has been lost. 15 of 20 tracked markets declined in value between November and December 2009.
Meanwhile, it’s interesting to note the 5 markets that didn’t decline — Detroit, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Phoenix and San Diego. Each of these metro regions were among the hardest hit nationwide when home prices first broke. Now, they’re leading the pack in price recovery.
For some real estate investors, that’s a positive signal. But we also have to consider the Case-Shiller Index’s flaws because they’re big ones, and because you’ve heard me complain about them in the past whenever I quoted it (I feel a need to be consistent in my issues with the index and the way its calculated)
As examples:
- Case-Shiller data is reported on a 2-month lag
- The Case-Shiller sample set includes just 20 U.S. cities
- There’s no “national real estate market” — real estate is local
That said, the Case-Shiller Index is still important. As the most widely-used private sector housing index, Case-Shiller helps to identify broader housing trends and many people believe housing is a key element in the economic recovery.
I have often said that we will only recognize the recovery in retrospect because that has been the case in the past. The first indicators of changes in the economy, and the articles about them are often ignored in the face of “common knowledge”, but they are often harbingers of what is to come. If the markets that led the housing decline will lead the housing resurgence, December’s data shows that full recovery is right around the corner.
